Nominalisation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*[[gerund]]s | *[[gerund]]s | ||
*[[infinitive]]s | *[[infinitive]]s | ||
===Examples=== | |||
:{{plain|[[have visibility of]]|see}} | |||
:{{plain|issue a notification to|tell}} | |||
:{{plain|have a discussion about|discuss}} | |||
:{{plain|we are supportive of|we support}} | |||
:{{plain|have the appearance of being|seem}}<br /> | |||
===[[Effect]]ing a nominalisation: grammatical cross-dressing<ref>Not that there’s anything wrong with cross-dressing, mind.</ref>=== | ===[[Effect]]ing a nominalisation: grammatical cross-dressing<ref>Not that there’s anything wrong with cross-dressing, mind.</ref>=== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 20: | ||
:{{plain|effect the conversion of shares|convert the shares}} | :{{plain|effect the conversion of shares|convert the shares}} | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[[Adjectivisation]] | *[[Adjectivisation]] | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 14 December 2018
Nominalisation — itself, a nominalisation of the verb to "nominalise"[1] — is the act, as adored by solicitors as it is loathed by anyone who cares for the English language, of gutting a precise verb, by converting it into a noun and jamming a general verb in front of it.
Or should I say:
- Nominalisation is the act, which induces adoration in solicitors as much as it effects a sensation of loathing in anyone having a fondness for the English language, of ensuring the evisceration of a precise verb by effecting its conversion into a noun (or adjective) and ensuring the jammery of a general verb in front of it.
Dead give aways:
- the string “ion of”
- gerunds
- infinitives
Examples
- Why say “have visibility of” when you mean “see”?
- Why say “issue a notification to” when you mean “tell”?
- Why say “have a discussion about” when you mean “discuss”?
- Why say “we are supportive of” when you mean “we support”?
- Why say “have the appearance of being” when you mean “seem”?
Effecting a nominalisation: grammatical cross-dressing[2]
The worst kind of nominalisation goes a step further: not only must the poor verb dress up as a noun; an equally unsuspecting noun must behave like a verb. “Effect” is this kind of nominalisation:
- Why say “effect the conversion of shares” when you mean “convert the shares”?
See also
- Adjectivisation
- Of - a dead giveaway.
- To be - the feeblest of all verbs.
- Obligated