Copyright: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*a '''low risk''' of breach of confidence: By definition this information is in the public domain – anyone who wants to pay for it can have it. | *a '''low risk''' of breach of confidence: By definition this information is in the public domain – anyone who wants to pay for it can have it. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Confidence]] | *[[Confidence]] | ||
*[[Confidentiality agreement]] | *[[Confidentiality agreement]] | ||
*[[Email signoff]] | *[[Email signoff]] | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020
see also: Information
Template:Copyright and confidence
Examples
Investor presentation materials
These present:
- a low risk of copyright infringement (even if you do “breach copyright”, who is going to sue you and what would their loss be?)
- a fairly low risk of breach of confidence (I guess you might violate securities laws by distributing materials in certain places)
- a fairly low risk from a market abuse perspective (by its nature investor materials are designed as a pitch to outsiders – and in those IBD scenarios where it might not be, you would be confi’d up to kingdom come anyway.
FT and Bloomberg articles
Commercially published articles (also index outputs and so on) present:
- a real risk of copyright infringement: here the very business motivation for creating them is that people who read them will be prepared to pay for them
- a low risk of breach of confidence: By definition this information is in the public domain – anyone who wants to pay for it can have it.