Determining Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|Determining Party}}
{{manual|MI|2002|Determining Party|Definition|Determining Party|short}}
Not to be confused with a {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} for the purposes of the [[{{eqderiv}}]] definitions, of course. Right? <br>

Revision as of 11:45, 10 March 2020

2002 ISDA Master Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™

Resources and navigation

[[{{{1}}} - 1992 ISDA Provision|This provision in the 1992]]

Resources Wikitext | Nutshell wikitext | 1992 ISDA wikitext | 2002 vs 1992 Showdown | 2006 ISDA Definitions | 2008 ISDA | JC’s ISDA code project
Navigation Preamble | 1(a) (b) (c) | 2(a) (b) (c) (d) | 3(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) | 4(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) | 55(a) Events of Default: 5(a)(i) Failure to Pay or Deliver 5(a)(ii) Breach of Agreement 5(a)(iii) Credit Support Default 5(a)(iv) Misrepresentation 5(a)(v) Default Under Specified Transaction 5(a)(vi) Cross Default 5(a)(vii) Bankruptcy 5(a)(viii) Merger Without Assumption 5(b) Termination Events: 5(b)(i) Illegality 5(b)(ii) Force Majeure Event 5(b)(iii) Tax Event 5(b)(iv) Tax Event Upon Merger 5(b)(v) Credit Event Upon Merger 5(b)(vi) Additional Termination Event (c) (d) (e) | 6(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) | 7 | 8(a) (b) (c) (d) | 9(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) | 10 | 11 | 12(a) (b) | 13(a) (b) (c) (d) | 14 |

Index: Click to expand:

Definition Determining Party in a Nutshell

Use at your own risk, campers!
Determining Party” means the party who determines the Close-out Amount.

Full text of Definition Determining Party

Determining Party” means the party determining a Close-out Amount.

Related agreements and comparisons

Click here for the text of Section Determining Party in the 1992 ISDA
Template:Isdadiff Determining Party

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Content and comparisons

You want to spend your time looking at Close-out Amount, and, by way of comparison, the magnificent contrivance that was the 1992 ISDA’s equivalent, Loss or Market Quotation. There was no “Determining Party” concept in the 1992 ISDA.

Template

Summary

Not to be confused with a Determining Party for the purposes of the Equity Derivatives definitions, of course. Right?

Template

See also

Template

References