Credit Support Provider - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''No''', sayeth the Users' Guide to the {{1994csa}}: | '''No''', sayeth the Users' Guide to the {{1994csa}}: | ||
: | :“Parties to an {{isdama}} should not, however, be identified as {{isdaprov|Credit Support Provider}}s with respect to the Annex, ''as such term is intended only to apply to third parties''.” |
Revision as of 18:15, 21 June 2019
Should a Party to the document, where there is a CSA, be described as a "Credit Support Provider"?
No, sayeth the Users' Guide to the 1994 NY CSA:
- “Parties to an ISDA Master Agreement should not, however, be identified as Credit Support Providers with respect to the Annex, as such term is intended only to apply to third parties.”