Algorithm: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*The {{t|dogma}} of [[outsourcing]] is predicated on a [[playbook]]; a form of [[algorithm for the meatware]]. | *The {{t|dogma}} of [[outsourcing]] is predicated on a [[playbook]]; a form of [[algorithm for the meatware]]. | ||
Also of great interest to [[evolution]]ary biologists, psychiatrists and | Also of great interest to [[evolution]]ary biologists, psychiatrists and philosophers: According to {{author|Daniel Dennett}}, the great (if unstated) insight of {{author|Charles Darwin}}’s {{br|The Origin of Species}} was that the evolutionary process was a mindless, algorithmic one, that could operate without intervention. This made him a household name ([[Daniel Dennett|Dennett]], not Darwin) when he published {{br|Darwin’s Dangerous Idea}}. | ||
Dennett described it as “universal acid”, and it certainly seems to have burned through a few synapses in the [[management consultant|management consulting]] industry. That piece of [[Magic incantation|magic]]: that the ''something'' of rice pudding and income tax that could come from the ''nothing'' of primordial sludge, without a beneficent creator, is the basis behind the current dogmas of [[artificial intelligence]], and the belief that ''no'' intelligence, let alone [[subject matter expert]]ise, is needed to effectively run a complex process such as (for totally random example) the [[onboarding]] of trading counterparties in an [[investment bank]]. | Dennett described it as “universal acid”, and it certainly seems to have burned through a few synapses in the [[management consultant|management consulting]] industry. That piece of [[Magic incantation|magic]]: that the ''something'' of rice pudding and income tax that could come from the ''nothing'' of primordial sludge, without a beneficent creator, is the basis behind the current dogmas of [[artificial intelligence]], and the belief that ''no'' intelligence, let alone [[subject matter expert]]ise, is needed to effectively run a complex process such as (for totally random example) the [[onboarding]] of trading counterparties in an [[investment bank]]. | ||
Revision as of 07:32, 9 August 2019
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
An algorithm is a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer, or non-questioning drone in Bangalore. An algorithm’s success is predicated on all conundrums within its domain having been finally resolved, so it can operate without obstruction or intervention from a guiding intelligent hand.
Compare with a heuristic.
Of particular interest in financial services:
- High-frequency trading computers follow algorithms faster and more reliably than a mortal trader could dream of;
- The dogma of outsourcing is predicated on a playbook; a form of algorithm for the meatware.
Also of great interest to evolutionary biologists, psychiatrists and philosophers: According to Daniel Dennett, the great (if unstated) insight of Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species was that the evolutionary process was a mindless, algorithmic one, that could operate without intervention. This made him a household name (Dennett, not Darwin) when he published Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.
Dennett described it as “universal acid”, and it certainly seems to have burned through a few synapses in the management consulting industry. That piece of magic: that the something of rice pudding and income tax that could come from the nothing of primordial sludge, without a beneficent creator, is the basis behind the current dogmas of artificial intelligence, and the belief that no intelligence, let alone subject matter expertise, is needed to effectively run a complex process such as (for totally random example) the onboarding of trading counterparties in an investment bank.