Interpretation - CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{csaanat|1|1995}} | {{csaanat|1|1995|1(a)}} | ||
{{Csa 1 capsule|csa}} | {{Csa 1 capsule|csa}} | ||
===2016 version=== | ===2016 version=== | ||
Big change is the addition of Paragrpah {{vmcsaprov|1(b)}} in the {{vmcsa}}, rabbiting on about {{vmcsaprov|Other CSA}}s, {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}s and so on. | Big change is the addition of Paragrpah {{vmcsaprov|1(b)}} in the {{vmcsa}}, rabbiting on about {{vmcsaprov|Other CSA}}s, {{vmcsaprov|Covered Transaction}}s and so on. |
Revision as of 10:00, 9 January 2020
ISDA 1995 English Law Credit Support Annex
Paragraph 1. Interpretation
|
Nomenclature: Being an annex to an ISDA Master Agreement, references to the “Agreement” means that particular ISDA Master Agreement; the “Annex” is the 1995 CSA and, if you were pedantic enough that you really felt the need to refer to it, the “Schedule” is the schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement.
Covered Transaction: As a concept, “Covered Transaction” only arrived in the 2016 VM CSA, in Paragraph 1(b).
Under the 1995 CSA, the neatest way of describing whether a given set of Transactions is covered or not is to say something like:
“[SPECIFY] Transactions will [not] be relevant for purposes of determining “Exposure” under the 1995 CSA.”
2016 version
Big change is the addition of Paragrpah 1(b) in the 2016 VM CSA, rabbiting on about Other CSAs, Covered Transactions and so on.