Security financial collateral arrangement: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:13, 12 January 2020

A word about credit risk mitigation

Legal security: Mortgage • Pledge • Lien • Bailment Equitable security: Charge • fixed • floating \| ABWOS \| Equitable lien Credit risk mitigation: Title transfer \| Guarantee \| Letter of credit \| Netting Friends and relations: Rehypothecation \| Equivalent Documents: 1994 NY CSA \| 1995 CSA \| 1995 ISDA CSD (English law) Regulation: LPA 1925 \| Financial Collateral Regulations \| LPMPA 1994 Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Taking security Security Collateral

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not a title transfer financial collateral arrangement, but one where collateral is transferred by way of possession only, where the receiver has a security interest and may even have legal title but down not have beneficial ownership of the asset in question ... buuuuuut if rehypothecation is allowed, may be able to sell it anyway. Confused? Don’t be. Well, do be, but don’t feel ashamed about it. All is explained in our article on the Financial Collateral Directive. And, if not in that one, in our section on cognitive dissonance.

Fly, you fools!

But, really, you should fly. Fools.

Revision as of 22:11, 12 January 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,421 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:13, 12 January 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,421 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|security}}Not a [[title transfer financial collateral arrangement]], but one where [[collateral]] is transferred by way of possession only, where the receiver has a [[security interest]] and may even have [[legal title]] but down not have [[beneficial ownership]] of the asset in question ... buuuuuut if [[rehypothecation]] is allowed, may be able to sell it anyway. Confused? Don’t be. All is explained in our article on the [[Financial Collateral Directive]].		{{a\|security\|}}Not a [[title transfer financial collateral arrangement]], but one where [[collateral]] is transferred by way of possession only, where the receiver has a [[security interest]] and may even have [[legal title]] but down not have [[beneficial ownership]] of the asset in question ... buuuuuut if [[rehypothecation]] is allowed, may be able to sell it anyway. Confused? Don’t be. Well, ''do'' be, but don’t feel ashamed about it. All is explained in our article on the [[Financial Collateral Directive]]. And, if not in that one, in our section on [[cognitive dissonance]].

	Fly, you fools!		Fly, you fools!