Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 5(a)(iii): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A bit of pedantic flannel found its way in to the 2002ma — it captures not just the failure of the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} itself, but any security interest..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A bit of pedantic [[flannel]] found its way in to the 2002ma — it captures not just the failure of the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} itself, but any security interest granted under it, catering to the [[legal eagle]]’s paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct [[Ontology|ontological]] existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same.
A bit of pedantic [[flannel]] found its way in to the {{2002ma}} — it captures not just the failure of the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} itself, but any security interest granted under it, catering to the [[legal eagle]]’s paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct [[Ontology|ontological]] existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same.

Revision as of 10:56, 25 February 2020

A bit of pedantic flannel found its way in to the 2002 ISDA — it captures not just the failure of the Credit Support Document itself, but any security interest granted under it, catering to the legal eagle’s paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct ontological existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same.