Template:No oral modification capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "“'''No oral modification'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appea..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work.
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work.


No longer, as it ought to be, an entirely vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an what we impolitely consider to be a vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}.
No longer, as it ought to be, a vacuous piece of legal [[flannel]] — courtesy of an what we impolitely consider to be a vacuous piece of ''legal reasoning'' by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}.

Revision as of 17:24, 15 April 2020

No oral modification” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work.

No longer, as it ought to be, a vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an what we impolitely consider to be a vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited.