Template:No oral modification capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "“'''No oral modification'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appea..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
“'''[[No oral modification]]'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work. | “'''[[No oral modification]]'''” is a self-contradictory stricture on an [[amendment agreement]], until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work. | ||
No longer, as it ought to be, | No longer, as it ought to be, a vacuous piece of legal [[flannel]] — courtesy of an what we impolitely consider to be a vacuous piece of ''legal reasoning'' by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in {{Casenote|Rock Advertising Limited|MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}}. | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 15 April 2020
“No oral modification” is a self-contradictory stricture on an amendment agreement, until 2018 understood by all to be silly fluff put in a contract to appease the lawyers and guarantee them an annuity of tedious work.
No longer, as it ought to be, a vacuous piece of legal flannel — courtesy of an what we impolitely consider to be a vacuous piece of legal reasoning by no less an eminence than Lord Sumption of the Supreme Court in Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited.