Don’t tick boxes: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}}Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]], ''[[La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza]]''.<ref>Literally, “The Victory of Form over Substance”. Never popular.</ref> | {{a|devil|}}Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]], ''[[La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza]]''.<ref>Literally, “The Victory of Form over Substance”. Never popular.</ref> | ||
This disposition that ticking a box - fulfilling a formal requirement to have taken a step, followed a process, or sublimated an | This disposition that ticking a box - fulfilling a formal requirement to have taken a step, followed a process, or sublimated an intractable hazard into a parametrised, traffic-light renderable [[key performance indicator]] should generate any comfort other than a false one, feeds on, just as it nourishes, related dogmas: of ''cost'' reduction, at all cost, that all unknowns can be known, that all vestiges of risk can neutralised, bifurcated, cauterised and ''eliminated'' to leave a pure, crystalline residue of concentrated ''reward''. That [[The End of History and the First Man - book review|history is at an end]], that the universe can be brute-force computed, and the fact that it hasn’t yet is a minor inconvenience that we can tide over just as long as we check of few boxes and keep a clear audit trail. | ||
[[Box ticking]] is [[tedious]], in the technical sense of being intrinsically wasteful. | [[Box ticking]] is [[tedious]], in the technical sense of being intrinsically wasteful. |
Revision as of 14:59, 8 August 2020
|
Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist Otto Büchstein, La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza.[1]
This disposition that ticking a box - fulfilling a formal requirement to have taken a step, followed a process, or sublimated an intractable hazard into a parametrised, traffic-light renderable key performance indicator should generate any comfort other than a false one, feeds on, just as it nourishes, related dogmas: of cost reduction, at all cost, that all unknowns can be known, that all vestiges of risk can neutralised, bifurcated, cauterised and eliminated to leave a pure, crystalline residue of concentrated reward. That history is at an end, that the universe can be brute-force computed, and the fact that it hasn’t yet is a minor inconvenience that we can tide over just as long as we check of few boxes and keep a clear audit trail.
Box ticking is tedious, in the technical sense of being intrinsically wasteful.
See also
Otto Büchstein’s dreary but important opera La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza.
References
- ↑ Literally, “The Victory of Form over Substance”. Never popular.