Big data: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}The obsession with big data has two implications:  
{{a|devil|}}:''Turkey'': “I have transformed myself into a data-driven business. All my data — and I've got reams of the stuff — tells me that every morning I shall be fed at 9 am precisely.
 
:Aha! Here comes the farmer, right on time! I wonder if I'll get a special treat because it is Christmas!”
 
 
The obsession with big data has two implications:  


Firstly it expresses a preference for the aggregate and the mean over the outlier, the individual, the unique or extraordinary. It is to cater for the average. It is to prefer the mediocre for its weight of numbers over the genius and its isolated vision. As surely as the ugliest man killed God, so did data kill the superman. The ''will to power'' is defeated by the million-strong dull blades of the ''will to entropy''.
Firstly it expresses a preference for the aggregate and the mean over the outlier, the individual, the unique or extraordinary. It is to cater for the average. It is to prefer the mediocre for its weight of numbers over the genius and its isolated vision. As surely as the ugliest man killed God, so did data kill the superman. The ''will to power'' is defeated by the million-strong dull blades of the ''will to entropy''.

Revision as of 07:52, 3 October 2020

In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.
Turkey: “I have transformed myself into a data-driven business. All my data — and I've got reams of the stuff — tells me that every morning I shall be fed at 9 am precisely.
Aha! Here comes the farmer, right on time! I wonder if I'll get a special treat because it is Christmas!”


The obsession with big data has two implications:

Firstly it expresses a preference for the aggregate and the mean over the outlier, the individual, the unique or extraordinary. It is to cater for the average. It is to prefer the mediocre for its weight of numbers over the genius and its isolated vision. As surely as the ugliest man killed God, so did data kill the superman. The will to power is defeated by the million-strong dull blades of the will to entropy.

Second in its reductionism, in its funnelling of a dispersed population into an essential homogeneity, it speaks to the underlying belief in a grand unifying theory:a transcendent truth. Its non-accommodation of pluralism is a denial of pluralism.

See also