LegalHub: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|devil|}}Bringing GitHub to the legal eagles. Credit to '''Graeme Johnston''' of https://www.juralio.com for the nub of this idea. So the idea is very very formative,..."
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 5: Line 5:
*Validation/authentication of text (i.e. if text is downloaded can it be corrupted??) — [[the code is law]]
*Validation/authentication of text (i.e. if text is downloaded can it be corrupted??) — [[the code is law]]
   
   
For example: publish the components of a basic [[confidentiality agreement]]. Phase (a): publish in downloadable templates in word or PDF format.
For example: publish the components of a basic [[confidentiality agreement]].
and say to everyone "have at it. help yourself."


and break out all the boilerplate - governing law, reps and warranties etc.
 
===Phase (a): publish===
*Establish platform
*Publish in downloadable templates in word or PDF format and say to everyone "have at it. help yourself." Sponsor then as XYZ content, open source. Standard agreements — NDAs etc.
*Grant pre-approved users (with low threshold) ability to do likewise
*Develop navigation methodology - metadata tags, Boolean search etc.
*Reputation management for templates
 
===Phase (b): modularise===
*Strip back and break out all the boilerplate - governing law, reps and warranties etc.
basically make an online, simple, doc assembly tool - free for anyone to use and play around with as they wish.
basically make an online, simple, doc assembly tool - free for anyone to use and play around with as they wish.
   
   
Phased approach with a series of successive goals, which depend on the last one being achieved.
Phased approach with a series of successive goals, which depend on the last one being achieved.

Revision as of 21:00, 16 November 2020

In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Bringing GitHub to the legal eagles. Credit to Graeme Johnston of https://www.juralio.com for the nub of this idea.

So the idea is very very formative, but in a nutshell it is like an open-source GitHub, only for legal code — that is, legal text. Words. The challenge is to keep the simplicity but not throw away the opportunities provided by the network and the digital.

  • STP, authentication, workflow
  • Validation/authentication of text (i.e. if text is downloaded can it be corrupted??) — the code is law

For example: publish the components of a basic confidentiality agreement.


Phase (a): publish

  • Establish platform
  • Publish in downloadable templates in word or PDF format and say to everyone "have at it. help yourself." Sponsor then as XYZ content, open source. Standard agreements — NDAs etc.
  • Grant pre-approved users (with low threshold) ability to do likewise
  • Develop navigation methodology - metadata tags, Boolean search etc.
  • Reputation management for templates

Phase (b): modularise

  • Strip back and break out all the boilerplate - governing law, reps and warranties etc.

basically make an online, simple, doc assembly tool - free for anyone to use and play around with as they wish.

Phased approach with a series of successive goals, which depend on the last one being achieved.