Ejusdem generis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|latin|}}{{ejusdem generic capsule}} | {{a|latin|}}{{ejusdem generic capsule}} | ||
{{interpretation sa}} | {{interpretation sa}} | ||
*[[without limitation]] | *[[without limitation]] | ||
*The [[JC]]’s parable of [[the farmer and the sheep]] | *The [[JC]]’s parable of [[the farmer and the sheep]] |
Latest revision as of 15:25, 10 January 2022
The JC’s guide to pithy Latin adages
|
The ejusdem generis rule of statutory interpretation — which we contract hacks like when it suits us to extend by analogy into contractual interpretation — says wherever general words follow specific words, the general words should be read to include only objects similar in nature to those specific words.
So, “any uprising, riot, looting, organised disobedience or other civil commotion” would not include “ironic flash-mob performances of songs from The Sound of Music, however tiresome or poorly organised”, as long as not specifically violent in aspect (of course, there is every chance that passers-by would become spontaneously violent upon being confronted by an ironic flash mob).
See also
- Statutory interpretation
- Contractual interpretation
- Ejusdem generis
- Noscitur a sociis
- Generalia specialibus non derogant
- Fair, large and liberal
- And the JC’s own short-hand to the lot of them: non mentula esse
- without limitation
- The JC’s parable of the farmer and the sheep