OneNDA: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|design|}}Don’t read about it here: go see: https://www.onenda.org We love the idea that standard, boilerplate, should be regarded as a utility and not some secret sauce..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
We love the idea that standard, boilerplate, should be regarded as a utility and not some secret sauce that keeps battalions of [[legal eagle]]s in well-paid but soul destroying work. | We love the idea that standard, boilerplate, should be regarded as a utility and not some secret sauce that keeps battalions of [[legal eagle]]s in well-paid but soul destroying work. | ||
Kudos, therefore to the team at the [http://www.lawboutique.co.uk Law Boutique] for doing something about it. The JC will put his shoulder to the wheel, for whatever that is worth, and commends his friends and | Kudos, therefore to the team at the [http://www.lawboutique.co.uk Law Boutique] for doing something about it. The JC will put his shoulder to the wheel, for whatever that is worth, and commends his friends, relations and readers who occupy places in the firmament higher places than his own — that’s more or less all of you — to do what you can to get your organisations behind this excellent initiative. | ||
Of course, the effluxion of time, the inevitable [[special pleading]], the [[committee]] drafting to which we agents of the tragic commons resort by irrepressible force of habit may mean this augers into the ground, but we can but try. | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Confidentiality agreement]] | |||
Revision as of 16:52, 17 February 2021
|
The design of organisations and products
|
Don’t read about it here: go see: https://www.onenda.org
We love the idea that standard, boilerplate, should be regarded as a utility and not some secret sauce that keeps battalions of legal eagles in well-paid but soul destroying work.
Kudos, therefore to the team at the Law Boutique for doing something about it. The JC will put his shoulder to the wheel, for whatever that is worth, and commends his friends, relations and readers who occupy places in the firmament higher places than his own — that’s more or less all of you — to do what you can to get your organisations behind this excellent initiative.
Of course, the effluxion of time, the inevitable special pleading, the committee drafting to which we agents of the tragic commons resort by irrepressible force of habit may mean this augers into the ground, but we can but try.