Failure to Deliver - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Changed redirect target from Consequences of an Additional Disruption Event - Equity Derivatives Provision to Additional Disruption Event definitions - Equity Derivatives Provision Tag: Redirect target changed |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Removed redirect to Additional Disruption Event definitions - Equity Derivatives Provision Tag: Removed redirect |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{manual|DEQ|2002|12.9(a)(iii)|Section||short}} |
Revision as of 14:07, 19 May 2022
Content and comparisons
Section 12.9(a): The actual Additional Disruption Events
Summary
Not generally stipulated as an Additional Disruption Event because firstly it would only be relevant in a physically-settled equity swap, and for a host of reasons taking physical settlement at the conclusion of a synthetic transaction, whose point is partly to avoid a physical exposure, is a bit of a contradiction in terms. Now where you do, for reasons best known to yourself, elect physical settlement this provision allows the innocent party to buy-in and charge any cost differential to the failing party.
You may want to head over to Consequences of Failure to Deliver under 12.9(b)(ii), where you will discover that ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ have ploughed their own long, lonely, weird furrow about how to resolve settlement failures instead of copying what the cash equity markets and stock lending markets do. They’re fun like that, are the ’squad.