Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{image|JCLR|png|}}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a most excellent but roguish reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk.
{{cn}}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a most excellent but roguish reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk.


{{subtableflex|45|<categorytree mode="pages" namespaces="Main">Case notes</categorytree>}}
{{subtableflex|45|<categorytree mode="pages" namespaces="Main">Case notes</categorytree>}}

Latest revision as of 16:53, 29 August 2024

The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
Editorial Board of the JCLR: Managing Editor: Lord Justice Cocklecarrot M.R. · General Editor: Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, K.C. · Principle witness: Mrs. Pinterman

Common law | Litigation | Contract | Tort |

Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

This is the present selection of cases in the Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports, a most excellent but roguish reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly disclaimed. Use at your own risk.