You would say that: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|devil|}} a nascent theory of professional legal advice. A private practitioners greatest fear is a bright-line. Any opportunity to to blur the edges of old white line is..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|devil|}} | {{a|devil|}}A nascent theory of professional legal practice. | ||
A private | A private practitioner’s greatest fear a [[bright line test|bright-line]]. You can't do anything with a bright line, you can't vacillate around it. You're either one side or the other. Lawyer likes to vacillate.Any opportunity to to blur the edges of old white line is an opportunity to extemporise on a client dine whilst taking little or no risk and whilst subjecting oneself to little or no criticism. | ||
So, for example, we are told that institutional big boy letters should be effective at disclaiming liability for prospectuses at least when selling too sophisticated institutional clients. | So, for example, we are told that institutional big boy letters should be effective at disclaiming liability for prospectuses at least when selling too sophisticated institutional clients. | ||
Revision as of 15:19, 12 November 2022
|
A nascent theory of professional legal practice.
A private practitioner’s greatest fear a bright-line. You can't do anything with a bright line, you can't vacillate around it. You're either one side or the other. Lawyer likes to vacillate.Any opportunity to to blur the edges of old white line is an opportunity to extemporise on a client dine whilst taking little or no risk and whilst subjecting oneself to little or no criticism.
So, for example, we are told that institutional big boy letters should be effective at disclaiming liability for prospectuses at least when selling too sophisticated institutional clients.
See also
Inclined to be supportive