Risk-weighted assets: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{aai|g|}}{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|/rɪsk ˈweɪtɪd ˈæsɛts /|n}} | ||
[[Risk-weighted assets]] are used to determine the minimum amount of [[Regulatory capital|capital]] that banks and other financial institutions must hold to guard against their risk of insolvency. It is based on a risk assessment for each type of asset the bank holds on its balance sheet. | [[Risk-weighted assets]] are used to determine the minimum amount of [[Regulatory capital|capital]] that banks and other financial institutions must hold to guard against their risk of insolvency. It is based on a risk assessment for each type of asset the bank holds on its balance sheet. |
Revision as of 09:24, 21 March 2023
From our machine overlords Here is what, NiGEL, our cheeky little GPT3 chatbot had to say when asked to explain:
|
Risk-weighted assets
/rɪsk ˈweɪtɪd ˈæsɛts / (n.)
Risk-weighted assets are used to determine the minimum amount of capital that banks and other financial institutions must hold to guard against their risk of insolvency. It is based on a risk assessment for each type of asset the bank holds on its balance sheet.
For example, a loan that is secured by a letter of credit is considered to be riskier and requires more capital than a loan that is secured with a mortgage.
The global financial crisis was something of a come-to-Jehosophat moment for the Basel boxwallahs, as it turned out not to be a very good measure of risk, being somewhat counter-cyclical. So they in Basel III they introduced the leverage ratio to capture risks that they decided the RWA measure wasn’t capturing.
See also
- ↑ The exception proves the rule.