Template:M comp disc EUA Annex Suspension Event: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Suspension Event - Emissions Annex Provision|This]] a ''limited'' thing — some would say, arbitrarily limited — where regulatory/government fiat at the heart of the [[European Union]] stops the system functioning as it should, but not permanently. So, taking the {{euaprov|Union Registry}} offline, an {{euaprov|Administrator Event}} — but not some other regulatory driven externalities. It doesn’t include {{euaprov|Abandonment of Scheme}} or an executive decision (however unlikely) that {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} are no longer elibigle for surrender in {{euaprov|Phase 4}}. | [[Suspension Event - Emissions Annex Provision|This]] a ''limited'' thing — some would say, arbitrarily limited — where regulatory/government fiat at the heart of the [[European Union]] stops the system functioning as it should, but not permanently. So, taking the {{euaprov|Union Registry}} offline, an {{euaprov|Administrator Event}} — but not some other regulatory driven externalities. It doesn’t include {{euaprov|Abandonment of Scheme}} or an executive decision (however unlikely) that {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} are no longer elibigle for surrender in {{euaprov|Phase 4}}. | ||
===“[[Fungibility Event]]s” and what one should do if the sky falls in on one’s head etc.=== | |||
''Would'' {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} ever be ineligible for surrender in {{euaprov|Phase 4}}? Technically yes; practically no. Article [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0087 13 of the EU ETS Directive] requires Member States to issue replacement {{euaprov|Phase 4}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} to those poor souls stuck with stale {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} — they are generally valid for eight years from issue). The result, as the Michał Głowacki’s excellent site [https://emissions-euets.com/euas-validity remarks], is | ''Would'' {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} ever be ineligible for surrender in {{euaprov|Phase 4}}? Technically yes; practically no. Article [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0087 13 of the EU ETS Directive] requires Member States to issue replacement {{euaprov|Phase 4}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} to those poor souls stuck with stale {{euaprov|Phase 3}} {{euaprov|Allowances}} — they are generally valid for eight years from issue). The result, as the Michał Głowacki’s excellent site [https://emissions-euets.com/euas-validity remarks], is | ||
Revision as of 13:41, 21 March 2023
This a limited thing — some would say, arbitrarily limited — where regulatory/government fiat at the heart of the European Union stops the system functioning as it should, but not permanently. So, taking the Union Registry offline, an Administrator Event — but not some other regulatory driven externalities. It doesn’t include Abandonment of Scheme or an executive decision (however unlikely) that Phase 3 Allowances are no longer elibigle for surrender in Phase 4.
“Fungibility Events” and what one should do if the sky falls in on one’s head etc.
Would Phase 3 Allowances ever be ineligible for surrender in Phase 4? Technically yes; practically no. Article 13 of the EU ETS Directive requires Member States to issue replacement Phase 4 Allowances to those poor souls stuck with stale Phase 3 Allowances — they are generally valid for eight years from issue). The result, as the Michał Głowacki’s excellent site remarks, is
“Emission allowances will no more be replaced between periods, but will be valid indefinitely.”
Therefore elaborate provisions to provide what happens in an Allowance Option or Allowance Forward should Phase 3 Allowances become ineligible, (we have seen this described, oddly, as a “Fungibility Event” though clearly it is not that — the instruments are not and never have been “fungible”), feel the product of a surfeit of caution.
One — even the most chicken-lickenish legal eagle — generally does not cater in one’s contracts for future changes in law, unless there is a real apprehension that the change is in contemplation and likely to come about — if legislation is before the house, or a case on appeal to the Supreme Court: that sort of thing.