Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Applicable Close-out Rate: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
Line 1: Line 1:
Truly from the {{isia}} file — almost in the [[shoot me]] file. This whole game of pan-dimensional chess, with ''six'' different rates to apply in different circumstances, is all just to work out how to accrue interest on {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s and {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}s when closing out. You get a strong sense that the pragmatists of {{icds}} — if there are any — had well and truly tuned out and gone to the bar by the the ’squad got to this definition. Looking on the bright side, ''at least it doesn’t mention [[LIBOR]]''.<ref>[[File:Dramatic Chipmunk.png|left|100px|frameless]]Did someone say ''[[LIBOR]]''?</ref>
Truly from the {{isia}} file — almost in the [[shoot me]] file. This whole game of pan-dimensional chess, with ''six'' different rates to apply in different circumstances, is all just to work out how to accrue interest on {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s and {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}s when closing out. You get a strong sense that the pragmatists of {{icds}} — if there are any — had well and truly tuned out and gone to the bar by the the ’squad got to this definition. Looking on the bright side, ''at least it doesn’t mention [[LIBOR]]''.<ref>[[File:Dramatic Chipmunk.png|left|100px|frameless]]Did someone say ''[[LIBOR]]''?</ref>
An easier way of thinking about it:
====There is an Event of Default====
If there is an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} it will be the {{isdaprov|Default Rate}} or the {{isdaprov|Non-default Rate}}, depending on who is paying, whether it is an {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}} or an {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}}, before or after the {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} payment date. That knocks out a lot of the complexity right there:  {{quote|
A {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} pays the {{isdaprov|Default Rate}} and a {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} pays the {{isdaprov|Non-default Rate}}. In all circumstances.}}
====There is not an Event of Default====
This includes {{isdaprov|Termination Events}} and ''quasi'' {{isdaprov|Termination Events}} — things like {{isdaprov|Force Majeure Event}}s and {{isdaprov|Illegality}} where there is a {{isdaprov|Waiting Period}} or a deferral of some kind. Here it will be
:Until the day the {{isdaprov|Early Termination Amount}} is due (factoring in any {{isdaprov|Waiting Period}}), the {{isdaprov|Applicable Deferral Rate}}, and after that point the {{isdaprov|Termination Rate}}.
Look, I said easi''er'', not eas''y''. You do sense that it could have been quite a lot less convoluted even than this, don’t you.

Revision as of 15:03, 30 May 2023

Truly from the I’m sorry I asked file — almost in the shoot me file. This whole game of pan-dimensional chess, with six different rates to apply in different circumstances, is all just to work out how to accrue interest on Unpaid Amounts and Early Termination Amounts when closing out. You get a strong sense that the pragmatists of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ — if there are any — had well and truly tuned out and gone to the bar by the the ’squad got to this definition. Looking on the bright side, at least it doesn’t mention LIBOR.[1]

  1. Did someone say LIBOR?