Outsourcing: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a| | {{a|work|}}There is a close correlation between how much public infrastructure projects cost — in the case of mass transit the cost per km of the system — and the degree to which the mandating government has outsourced its project management and infrastructural expertise. The more ideological its commitment to outsourcing, the greater the cost.<ref>{{pl|https://transitcosts.com/transit-costs-study-final-report/|Transit costs study}},for example. | ||
It has little to do with the general cost of living in the area: the index cost per km of infrastructure in Vietnam (which has a 50% tunnel ratio), was 425, while Switzerland, with 73% tunnels, was well under half that at 173. Portugal (60% tunnels) was the most efficient at 96, and most expensive, with 1037 (although a 100% tunnel ratio) was not Hong Kong, Singapore or even the UK but good old free market [[New Zealand]]! | |||
A great boon for [[management consultants]], but a chocolate starfish for anyone else. | |||
Management consultancy textbooks will glowingly quote {{author|Anthony Burgess}}: “A sure sign of an amateur is too much detail to compensate for too little life”. | Management consultancy textbooks will glowingly quote {{author|Anthony Burgess}}: “A sure sign of an amateur is too much detail to compensate for too little life”. | ||
Management consultants aren’t generally | Management consultants aren’t generally very good with literature. Much less detail. This they take as a mandate to [[ignore]] the messy intractable details of a business process, and instead look at the big picture. A good rule of thumb, they say, is [[Pareto rule|Pareto's]] [[80:20 rule|80/20 rule]]: 20% of the activities will consume 80% of the costs. 80% of the revenue will come from 20% of the clients. And so on. | ||
Step one — undoubtedly right — leads to step 2: if we could only identify what that 80% is, we could relocate it to a cheaper means of production and bingo — easy cost savings. | Step one — undoubtedly right — leads to step 2: if we could only identify what that 80% is, we could relocate it to a cheaper means of production and bingo — easy cost savings. | ||
Revision as of 14:37, 23 September 2024
|
Office anthropology™
|
There is a close correlation between how much public infrastructure projects cost — in the case of mass transit the cost per km of the system — and the degree to which the mandating government has outsourced its project management and infrastructural expertise. The more ideological its commitment to outsourcing, the greater the cost.<ref>Transit costs study,for example.
It has little to do with the general cost of living in the area: the index cost per km of infrastructure in Vietnam (which has a 50% tunnel ratio), was 425, while Switzerland, with 73% tunnels, was well under half that at 173. Portugal (60% tunnels) was the most efficient at 96, and most expensive, with 1037 (although a 100% tunnel ratio) was not Hong Kong, Singapore or even the UK but good old free market New Zealand!
A great boon for management consultants, but a chocolate starfish for anyone else.
Management consultancy textbooks will glowingly quote Anthony Burgess: “A sure sign of an amateur is too much detail to compensate for too little life”.
Management consultants aren’t generally very good with literature. Much less detail. This they take as a mandate to ignore the messy intractable details of a business process, and instead look at the big picture. A good rule of thumb, they say, is Pareto's 80/20 rule: 20% of the activities will consume 80% of the costs. 80% of the revenue will come from 20% of the clients. And so on.
Step one — undoubtedly right — leads to step 2: if we could only identify what that 80% is, we could relocate it to a cheaper means of production and bingo — easy cost savings.
What this misses
- it's low value, not no value.