People’s Front of Judea: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Amwelladmin moved page The People’s Front of Judea to People’s Front of Judea |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{capsital|Reg}}: — Well, ''obviously'', once the vote’s been taken. You can’t act another resolution till you’ve voted on it.}} | {{capsital|Reg}}: — Well, ''obviously'', once the vote’s been taken. You can’t act another resolution till you’ve voted on it.}} | ||
{{D|People’s Front of Judea|/ˈpiːpᵊlz frʌnt ɒv ʤuː'dɪə/|n|}} | {{D|People’s Front of Judea|/ˈpiːpᵊlz frʌnt ɒv ʤuː'dɪə/|n|}} | ||
A collection of system insiders who agree that the system is malfunctioning | A collection of system insiders who agree that the system is malfunctioning are happy to pronounce publicly — semi-publicly — that something must be done to correct it but who, when it comes to it, are not prepared to do anything about it. | ||
So named after the paramilitary group in {{br|Monty Python’s Life of Brian}} ''[I thought it was the | So named after the paramilitary group in {{br|Monty Python’s Life of Brian}} ''[I thought it was the “Popular Front”? — Ed]'' referenced above. | ||
A classic [[Judean People’s Front]] is the one that will be at pains to entreat commercial lawyers the world over to write simple, clear, business-friendly contracts in [[Plain English|plain English]]. Econmiums will issue forth from [[Key information document|European regulators]], [[Securities and Exchange Commission|US regulators]], [[A Manual of Style For the Drafting of Contracts|drafting doyens]], prose stylists, legaltech bros and divers industry greybeards that simplifying contractual language is an utter imperative for efficiency, productivity, access to justice, diversity and inclusion and any number of other fashionable ''soups du jour'' — but will contracts get any shorter? Will they ''{{strike|fuck|profane expression which may refer to the act of sexual intercourse, but is also commonly used as an intensifier or to convey disdain}}''. | A classic [[Judean People’s Front]] is the one that will be at pains to entreat commercial lawyers the world over to write simple, clear, business-friendly contracts in [[Plain English|plain English]]. Econmiums will issue forth from [[Key information document|European regulators]], [[Securities and Exchange Commission|US regulators]], [[A Manual of Style For the Drafting of Contracts|drafting doyens]], prose stylists, legaltech bros and divers industry greybeards that simplifying contractual language is an utter imperative for efficiency, productivity, access to justice, diversity and inclusion and any number of other fashionable ''soups du jour'' — but will contracts get any shorter? Will they ''{{strike|fuck|profane expression which may refer to the act of sexual intercourse, but is also commonly used as an intensifier or to convey disdain}}''. | ||
Revision as of 16:59, 27 August 2024
|
The JC’s amateur guide to systems theory™
|
Judith: They’ve arrested Brian!
Reg: What?
Judith: They’ve dragged him off! They’re going to crucify him!
Reg: Right! This calls for immediate discussion!
PFJ Commando: Yeah!
Judith: What?!
Loretta: New motion?
Reg: Completely new motion, eh, that, ah — that there be, ah, immediate action —
Francis: — once the vote has been taken —
Reg: — Well, obviously, once the vote’s been taken. You can’t act another resolution till you’ve voted on it.
People’s Front of Judea
/ˈpiːpᵊlz frʌnt ɒv ʤuː'dɪə/ (n.)
A collection of system insiders who agree that the system is malfunctioning are happy to pronounce publicly — semi-publicly — that something must be done to correct it but who, when it comes to it, are not prepared to do anything about it.
So named after the paramilitary group in Monty Python’s Life of Brian [I thought it was the “Popular Front”? — Ed] referenced above.
A classic Judean People’s Front is the one that will be at pains to entreat commercial lawyers the world over to write simple, clear, business-friendly contracts in plain English. Econmiums will issue forth from European regulators, US regulators, drafting doyens, prose stylists, legaltech bros and divers industry greybeards that simplifying contractual language is an utter imperative for efficiency, productivity, access to justice, diversity and inclusion and any number of other fashionable soups du jour — but will contracts get any shorter? Will they fuck profane expression which may refer to the act of sexual intercourse, but is also commonly used as an intensifier or to convey disdain.