Elective eligible counterparties - COBS Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The famous "{{cobsprov|elective ECP}}" categorisation. As you'll see from the snapshot below:
The famous "{{cobsprov|elective ECP}}" categorisation. As you'll see from the snapshot below:
*Many {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s are also {{cassprov|per se eligible counterparties}} - but not all.
*Many {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s are also {{cobsprov|per se eligible counterparties}} - but not all.
*Those {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s that are not {{cobsprov|per se eligible ECP}}s - ie that are {{cobsprov|elective ECP}}s - can only be treated as {{cobsprov|ECP}}s if ''they'' have requested this categorisation. Now one might, of course, gently put that idea in such a client's head: nothing wrong with that. Politely suggesting an elective ECP might wish to think about requesting an upgrade is one thing - but one cannot unilaterally categorise an elective ECP as an ECPwithout them first requesting it.
*Those {{cobsprov|per se professional client}}s that are not {{cobsprov|per se eligible ECP}}s - ie that are {{cobsprov|elective ECP}}s - can only be treated as {{cobsprov|ECP}}s if ''they'' have requested this categorisation. Now one might, of course, gently put that idea in such a client's head: nothing wrong with that. Politely suggesting an elective ECP might wish to think about requesting an upgrade is one thing - but one cannot unilaterally categorise an elective ECP as an ECPwithout them first requesting it.
*an "elective professional client" (ie one is able to be ugraded from retail to professional) cannot further request to be treated as an {{cobsprov|ECP}}.
*an "elective professional client" (ie one is able to be ugraded from retail to professional) cannot further request to be treated as an {{cobsprov|ECP}}.

Revision as of 09:59, 28 April 2015

The famous "elective ECP" categorisation. As you'll see from the snapshot below:

  • Many per se professional clients are also per se eligible counterparties - but not all.
  • Those per se professional clients that are not per se eligible ECPs - ie that are elective ECPs - can only be treated as ECPs if they have requested this categorisation. Now one might, of course, gently put that idea in such a client's head: nothing wrong with that. Politely suggesting an elective ECP might wish to think about requesting an upgrade is one thing - but one cannot unilaterally categorise an elective ECP as an ECPwithout them first requesting it.
  • an "elective professional client" (ie one is able to be ugraded from retail to professional) cannot further request to be treated as an ECP.

Section 3.6.4, COBS Rules

COBS Rules
Template:COBS Section 3.6.4
View Template

The JC’s Reg and Leg resource™
UK Edition

{{{2}}}

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.