Specified Indebtedness - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "{{isdaanatomy}}" to "{{anat|isda}}" |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Of particular interest in the debate on {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{efetprov|Specified Indebtedness}} in the {{efetma}}. | Of particular interest in the debate on {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of {{efetprov|Specified Indebtedness}} in the {{efetma}}. | ||
{{ | {{anat|isda}} |
Revision as of 11:16, 2 August 2016
In gory detail
1992 ISDA |
2002 ISDA |
Commentary
A simple and innocuous enough looking provision. Ahh, but what to make of the definition of borrowed money? Could it include repo? (No, according to Simon Firth - see here)
Of particular interest in the debate on Cross Default. Please refer to that section for a fuller discussion. see also the somewhat clumsier (but materially similar) definition of Specified Indebtedness in the EFET Master Agreement.