Enter into: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:11, 9 December 2016

In which one does not need the preposition “into” seeing as, by definition, entering something — even a legal contract — is “going into it”.

Nonetheless, the resourceful draftsperson will insist on entering into legal agreements (and might correct your draft if you neglect to do so). Indeed, one with a higher dan might even chain his or her prepositions together, tether them to a passive and speak reverently of a transaction “entered into under this agreement”.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-In which we see insistence upon the unnecessary preposition “into”, seeing as the act of entering something necessarily involves going into it.
+In which one does not need the preposition “into” seeing as, by definition, entering something — even a legal contract — is “going into it”.
-Only a [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyer]] would insist on entering {{isdaprov|into}} a building. The laity would be happy enough just to enter it.
+Nonetheless, the resourceful draftsperson will insist on entering ''into'' legal agreements (and might correct your draft if you neglect to do so). Indeed, one with a higher dan might even chain {{sex|his or her}} {{tag|preposition}}s together, tether them to a {{tag|passive}} and speak reverently of a transaction “entered into ''under'' this agreement”.
-Nonetheless, the resourceful draftsperson will insist on entering ''into'' legal agreements (and might correct your draft if you neglect to say so). Indeed, one with a higher dan might even chain [[his or her]] {{tag|preposition}}s together and tether them to a {{tag|passive}}, and speak reverently of a transaction “entered into ''under'' this agreement”.
 {{plainenglish}}

Enter into: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:11, 9 December 2016

Navigation menu

Search