Capacity and authority: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "The twin pillars of paranoia that remain when all is said and done on your {{tag|negotiation}} and you're ready to sign on the dotted line. *whether the fellow who purports to..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The twin pillars of paranoia that remain when all is said and done on your {{tag|negotiation}} and you're ready to sign on the dotted line.
The twin pillars of paranoia that remain when all is said and done on your {{tag|negotiation}} and you're ready to sign on the dotted line.
*whether the fellow who purports to sign for your counterparty has any grounds to do so is a question of his {{tag|authority}}
*whether the fellow who purports to sign for your counterparty has any [[Ostensible authority|ostensible]] grounds to do so is a question of his {{tag|authority}}.
*whether your counterparty is constitutionally able to enter into obligations of the type contemplated by your contract, is a question of its {{tag|capacity}} (as to which see also [[ultra vires]].
*whether your counterparty is constitutionally able to enter into obligations of the type contemplated by your contract, is a question of its {{tag|capacity}} (as to which see also [[ultra vires]].
{{seealso}}
*[[Ostensible authority]]
*[[Principal]]
*[[Agency]]
*[[Unltra vires]]

Revision as of 15:42, 9 February 2017

The twin pillars of paranoia that remain when all is said and done on your negotiation and you're ready to sign on the dotted line.

  • whether the fellow who purports to sign for your counterparty has any ostensible grounds to do so is a question of his authority.
  • whether your counterparty is constitutionally able to enter into obligations of the type contemplated by your contract, is a question of its capacity (as to which see also ultra vires.

See also