It is not in my nature: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{box|
{{box|
{{what is it in itself}}
{{what is it in itself}}
:P—''[[Silence of the Lambs]]
: <small>—''[[Silence of the Lambs]]''</small>
}}
}}


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Frog and the scorpion]]
*[[Frog and the scorpion]]

Revision as of 08:25, 6 September 2017

A sense check one should always run before proposing a sensible, rational and logical change to a well-established process. Rational, logical and sensible processes are not always the prime motivating force when you deal with another human. Especially an attorney. What is his nature?

Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?

Clarice: He kills women —

Lecter: No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?

Clarice: Anger — social acceptance — and — sexual frustrations, sir —

Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet?

Silence of the Lambs


See also