Affected Party - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat2|isda|Affected Party|2002|Affected Party|1992}} | {{fullanat2|isda|Affected Party|2002|Affected Party|1992}} | ||
Note that [[ISDA]] in its wisdom chose not to have a generic term for the sort of person who is subject to either a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} ''or'' an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, so there is much "{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or Affected Party, as the case may be" sort of malarkey. | Note that [[ISDA]] in its wisdom chose not to have a generic term for the sort of person who is subject to either a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} ''or'' an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, so there is much "{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} or Affected Party, as the case may be" sort of malarkey. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} | *{{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} | *{{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} | *{{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} |
Revision as of 15:41, 2 October 2017
Note that ISDA in its wisdom chose not to have a generic term for the sort of person who is subject to either a Termination Event or an Event of Default, so there is much "Defaulting Party or Affected Party, as the case may be" sort of malarkey.