Electronic messages - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fullanat|isda| | {{fullanat|isda|electronic messages|2002}} | ||
An innocuous definition you would think ''but you would be wrong''. For behold: an electronic message ''excludes'' {{isdaprov|e-mail}}. This was a persuasive factor in the learned judge’s idiosyncratic reasoning in the great case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}, a case that illustrates the point that [[little old ladies make bad law]]. | An innocuous definition you would think ''but you would be wrong''. For behold: an electronic message ''excludes'' {{isdaprov|e-mail}}. This was a persuasive factor in the learned judge’s idiosyncratic reasoning in the great case of {{casenote|Greenclose|National Westminster Bank plc}}, a case that illustrates the point that [[little old ladies make bad law]]. |
Revision as of 13:30, 4 October 2017
An innocuous definition you would think but you would be wrong. For behold: an electronic message excludes e-mail. This was a persuasive factor in the learned judge’s idiosyncratic reasoning in the great case of Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc, a case that illustrates the point that little old ladies make bad law.