Pre-Estimate - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|6(e)(v)}}
{{isdaanat|6(e)(v)}}
From [[the lady doth protest too much]] school of contractual drafting, a neat and theoretically vacuous attempt to ensure that Early Terminaiton Amounts determined under an ISDA are not seen as (unenforceable) penalty clause, but rather a [[liquidated damages ]] clause — i.e., a “genuine pre-estimate of loss” caused by a breach of contract, as enunciated by Lord Dunedin in that famous contract case on penalty clauses, {{casenote|Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd|New Garage & Motor Co Ltd}}.
But it either is or it isn't. As it happens, it probably is a liquidated damages clause, but the parties agreeing in a standard form that it is one doesn't really help that analysis.

Revision as of 09:55, 18 April 2018

ISDA Anatomy™


In a Nutshell Section 6(e)(v):

6(e)(v) Pre-Estimate. The parties acknowledge that:
(a) Each Early Termination Amount is a reasonable pre-estimate of loss and not a penalty; and
(b) neither party may recover any additional damages as a consequence of terminating Terminated Transactions.

view template

2002 ISDA full text of Section 6(e)(v):

6(e)(v) Pre-Estimate. The parties agree that an amount recoverable under this Section 6(e) is a reasonable pre-estimate of loss and not a penalty. Such amount is payable for the loss of bargain and the loss of protection against future risks, and, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, neither party will be entitled to recover any additional damages as a consequence of the termination of the Terminated Transactions.

view template

Click here for the text of Section 6(e)(v) in the 1992 ISDA

Index: Click to expand:Navigation
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


From the lady doth protest too much school of contractual drafting, a neat and theoretically vacuous attempt to ensure that Early Terminaiton Amounts determined under an ISDA are not seen as (unenforceable) penalty clause, but rather a liquidated damages clause — i.e., a “genuine pre-estimate of loss” caused by a breach of contract, as enunciated by Lord Dunedin in that famous contract case on penalty clauses, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd.

But it either is or it isn't. As it happens, it probably is a liquidated damages clause, but the parties agreeing in a standard form that it is one doesn't really help that analysis.