Calculations - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{isdaanat|6(d)}}
{{isdaanat|6(d)}}
A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who insist on using the {{1992ma}} is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard. You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the ''Fast and Furious'' franchise. ''Because they can''.  Or, possibly, to preserve the slightly more generous [[grace period]]s for {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}<ref>Three days in the {{1992ma}} versus one in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> and {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}}<ref>Thirty days in the {{1992ma}} versus 15 in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you? But no).
A popular parlour game amongst those [[negotiator|pedants]] who still insist on using the {{1992ma}}<ref>Or, in fairness, are ''forced to'' by some other pedant, or a general institutional disposition towards pedantry, further up the chain.</ref> is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the {{2002ma}} standard. You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the ''Fast and Furious'' franchise. ''Because they can''.  Or, possibly, to preserve the slightly more generous [[grace period]]s for {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}<ref>Three days in the {{1992ma}} versus one in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> and {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}}<ref>Thirty days in the {{1992ma}} versus 15 in the {{2002ma}}.</ref> (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you? But no).


This clause has nothing to do with [[grace period]]s and evertything to do with {{isdaprov|Loss}} and {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ({{1992ma}} or {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s ({{2002ma}}, so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below.
This clause has nothing to do with [[grace period]]s and everything to do with {{isdaprov|Loss}} and {{isdaprov|Market Quotation}} ({{1992ma}}) or {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s ({{2002ma}}) so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below.
{{Diff}}
{{Diff}}


[[File:Payment Date diff.png|center|thumb|450px|Differences between {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}}]]
[[File:Payment Date diff.png|center|thumb|450px|Differences between {{1992ma}} and {{2002ma}}]]
<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>
<small>'''Previous''':  {{isdaprov|6(a)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(b)}}  |  {{isdaprov|6(c)}}  '''Next''':  {{isdaprov|6(e)}} </small>

Revision as of 16:20, 30 April 2018

ISDA Anatomy™


In a Nutshell Section 6(d):

6(d) Calculations; Payment Date.

(i) Statement. As soon as practicable following an Early Termination Date, each party will calculate its Section 6(e) amount and give the other party a statement:
(1) showing reasonable detail of its calculations;
(2) specifying any Early Termination Amount payable; and
(3) giving its bank details for payment of the Early Termination Amount.
Its records of any quotation or market data it uses will be conclusive of their accuracy.
(ii) Payment Date. An Early Termination Amount due in respect of any Early Termination Date will, together with any applicable interest, be payable
(1) on the day its Section 6(d) statement is effective (if the Early Termination Date follows an Event of Default) and
(2) two Local Business Days after the day its Section 6(d) statement is effective (or, where there were two Affected Parties, after the second statement is effective) (where the Early Termination Date follows a Termination Event.

view template

2002 ISDA full text of Section 6(d):

6(d) Calculations; Payment Date.

(i) Statement. On or as soon as reasonably practicable following the occurrence of an Early Termination Date, each party will make the calculations on its part, if any, contemplated by Section 6(e) and will provide to the other party a statement
(1) showing, in reasonable detail, such calculations (including any quotations, market data or information from internal sources used in making such calculations),
(2) specifying (except where there are two Affected Parties) any Early Termination Amount payable and
(3) giving details of the relevant account to which any amount payable to it is to be paid.
In the absence of written confirmation from the source of a quotation or market data obtained in determining a Close-out Amount, the records of the party obtaining such quotation or market data will be conclusive evidence of the existence and accuracy of such quotation or market data.
(ii) Payment Date. An Early Termination Amount due in respect of any Early Termination Date will, together with any amount of interest payable pursuant to Section 9(h)(ii)(2), be payable
(1) on the day on which notice of the amount payable is effective in the case of an Early Termination Date which is designated or occurs as a result of an Event of Default and
(2) on the day which is two Local Business Days after the day on which notice of the amount payable is effective (or, if there are two Affected Parties, after the day on which the statement provided pursuant to clause (i) above by the second party to provide such a statement is effective) in the case of an Early Termination Date which is designated as a result of a Termination Event.

view template

Click here for the text of Section 6(d) in the 1992 ISDA

Index: Click to expand:Navigation
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


A popular parlour game amongst those pedants who still insist on using the 1992 ISDA[1] is to laboriously upgrade every inconsistent provision to the 2002 ISDA standard. You might well ask why, but then you might well ask why anybody watches films from the Fast and Furious franchise. Because they can. Or, possibly, to preserve the slightly more generous grace periods for Failure to Pay[2] and Bankruptcy[3] (in which case, downgrade the new version, wouldn't you? But no).

This clause has nothing to do with grace periods and everything to do with Loss and Market Quotation (1992 ISDA) or Close-out Amounts (2002 ISDA) so expect to see it modified. Wiki DV set out below. [[special:diff/{{{1}}}/{{{2}}}|comparison]]

Differences between 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA

Previous: 6(a) | 6(b) | 6(c) Next: 6(e)

  1. Or, in fairness, are forced to by some other pedant, or a general institutional disposition towards pedantry, further up the chain.
  2. Three days in the 1992 ISDA versus one in the 2002 ISDA.
  3. Thirty days in the 1992 ISDA versus 15 in the 2002 ISDA.