Merger Without Assumption - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{isdaanat|5(a)(viii)}} | ||
This can be triggered if: | This can be triggered if: | ||
*The resulting party repudiates ''any'' outstanding {{isdaprov|Transactions}} under the {{isdama}}; or | *The resulting party repudiates ''any'' outstanding {{isdaprov|Transactions}} under the {{isdama}}; or | ||
*(in the case of a transfer of assets) a small rump of {{isdaprov|Transactions}} are left in the original entity, and not transferred at to the new entity. Now you would think this ought to be covered by {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, wouldn't you, because if there were no deterioration in credit and the transferring entity was still around and hadn’t winked out of existence then, | *(in the case of a transfer of assets) a small rump of {{isdaprov|Transactions}} are left in the original entity, and not transferred at to the new entity. Now you would think this ought to be covered by {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, wouldn't you, because if there were no deterioration in credit and the transferring entity was still around and hadn’t winked out of existence then, | ||
===And [[all or substantially all]] means?=== | ===And “[[all or substantially all]]” means?=== | ||
There's not a lot of case law on it. Some say 90%. Some say 75%. Some people say | There's not a lot of [[case law]] on it. Some say 90%. Some say 75%. Some people — your correspondent included — say “shoot me”. |
Revision as of 08:53, 26 June 2018
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
This can be triggered if:
- The resulting party repudiates any outstanding Transactions under the ISDA Master Agreement; or
- (in the case of a transfer of assets) a small rump of Transactions are left in the original entity, and not transferred at to the new entity. Now you would think this ought to be covered by Credit Event Upon Merger, wouldn't you, because if there were no deterioration in credit and the transferring entity was still around and hadn’t winked out of existence then,
And “all or substantially all” means?
There's not a lot of case law on it. Some say 90%. Some say 75%. Some people — your correspondent included — say “shoot me”.