Automatic Early Termination - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{isdaanat|6(a)}} | ||
{{isdaprov|Automatic Early Termination}} is an odd and misunderstood concept which exists in Section {{isdaprov|6(a)}} {{isdaprov|Right to Terminate Following Event of Default}} of the {{isdama}}. As is so much in the {{isdama}}, it’s all about '''[[Netting]]'''. Where a jurisdiction suspends terms of contracts in a period of formal insolvency, the idea is to have the ISDA break before that suspension kicks in — so close-out netting works. | |||
{{isdaprov|AET}} is only triggered by certain events under the {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}} [[Events of Default - ISDA Provision|event of default]] | {{isdaprov|AET}} is thus only triggered by ''certain'' events under the {{isdaprov|Bankruptcy}} [[Events of Default - ISDA Provision|event of default]] — formal bankruptcy procedures — and not by economic events that tend to indicate insolvency (such as an inability to pay debts as they fall due, [[technical insolvency]] or the exercise of security. Nor does it apply to other Events of Default. | ||
{{automaticearlytermination}} | {{automaticearlytermination}} | ||
===[[AET]] under the {{1987ma}}=== | ===[[AET]] under the {{1987ma}}=== | ||
Note the somewhat difficult position for AET under the {{1987ma}} - a fuller discussion at that article - which was part of the reason for the move to the {{1992ma}} in the first place. | Note the somewhat difficult position for {{tag|AET}} under the {{1987ma}} - a fuller discussion at that article - which was part of the reason for the move to the {{1992ma}} in the first place. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*{{isdaprov|Right to Terminate Following Event of Default}} | *{{isdaprov|Right to Terminate Following Event of Default}} |
Revision as of 09:25, 1 August 2018
ISDA Anatomy™
|
Automatic Early Termination is an odd and misunderstood concept which exists in Section 6(a) Right to Terminate Following Event of Default of the ISDA Master Agreement. As is so much in the ISDA Master Agreement, it’s all about Netting. Where a jurisdiction suspends terms of contracts in a period of formal insolvency, the idea is to have the ISDA break before that suspension kicks in — so close-out netting works.
AET is thus only triggered by certain events under the Bankruptcy event of default — formal bankruptcy procedures — and not by economic events that tend to indicate insolvency (such as an inability to pay debts as they fall due, technical insolvency or the exercise of security. Nor does it apply to other Events of Default.
Template:Automaticearlytermination
AET under the 1987 ISDA
Note the somewhat difficult position for AET under the 1987 ISDA - a fuller discussion at that article - which was part of the reason for the move to the 1992 ISDA in the first place.