Risk controller: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|risk|}} ===Chicken Licken=== We spend large parts of our daily life catering for contingencies that will never happen. Look upon a control function as a sort of ..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|risk|}} | {{a|risk|}} | ||
One of those fabulous men and women whose job is to make sure the institution they represent doesn’t unwittingly poke itself in the eye. | |||
People in these departments: | |||
*[[Credit]] | |||
*[[Legal]] | |||
*[[Compliance]] | |||
These poor people are the wrong side of an asymmetric option: no [[risk controller]] ever got credit for approving a deal that was colossally profitable, but plenty were eviscerated and left to dangle outside the city walls for neglecting to stop one that wasn’t<ref>This is, of course, outrageous hyperbole. No risk officer was so much as gruffly reprimanded for not anticipating the forthcoming [[global financial crisis]]: the [[circle of escalation]] saw to that.</ref> so you shouldn’t begrudge them the outlandishly risk-averse behavior in which they will inevitably indulge. | |||
After all, we spend large parts of our daily life catering for contingencies that will never happen. Look upon a [[control function]] as a sort of [[insurance]] against {{risk|risk}}. You pay a cost/premium up front (in time and organisational resources) to have someone manage the {{risk|risk}}. But are these meaningful contingencies or just comfort blankets – paper tigers and imaginary monsters that, as {{risk|individual}}s we are professionally incentivised to treat as real? | |||
{{sa}} | |||
*{{wastearticle|Over-processing}} - how risk controllers are incentivised to create {{wastearticle|waste}} in the negotiation process. | |||
*[[Chicken licken]] | |||
{{ref}} | |||
Revision as of 10:15, 3 June 2019
|
Risk Anatomy™
|
One of those fabulous men and women whose job is to make sure the institution they represent doesn’t unwittingly poke itself in the eye.
People in these departments:
These poor people are the wrong side of an asymmetric option: no risk controller ever got credit for approving a deal that was colossally profitable, but plenty were eviscerated and left to dangle outside the city walls for neglecting to stop one that wasn’t[1] so you shouldn’t begrudge them the outlandishly risk-averse behavior in which they will inevitably indulge.
After all, we spend large parts of our daily life catering for contingencies that will never happen. Look upon a control function as a sort of insurance against risk. You pay a cost/premium up front (in time and organisational resources) to have someone manage the risk. But are these meaningful contingencies or just comfort blankets – paper tigers and imaginary monsters that, as individuals we are professionally incentivised to treat as real?
See also
- Template:Wastearticle - how risk controllers are incentivised to create Template:Wastearticle in the negotiation process.
- Chicken licken
References
- ↑ This is, of course, outrageous hyperbole. No risk officer was so much as gruffly reprimanded for not anticipating the forthcoming global financial crisis: the circle of escalation saw to that.