Credit Support Default - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Note the charming contingency thast ISDA allows that the counterparty might default under a credit assurance offered by someone else altogether. | Note the charming contingency thast ISDA allows that the counterparty might default under a credit assurance offered by someone else altogether. | ||
Before you even put your hand up: no, | Before you even put your hand up: no, a [[Credit Support Annex]] between the two counterparties is ''not'' a {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}. It is a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} under the {{isdama}}. |
Revision as of 18:04, 21 June 2019
ISDA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
Note the charming contingency thast ISDA allows that the counterparty might default under a credit assurance offered by someone else altogether.
Before you even put your hand up: no, a Credit Support Annex between the two counterparties is not a Credit Support Document. It is a Transaction under the ISDA Master Agreement.