Lehman: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
No such thing. Are you looking for the [[Lehmans|Amish hardware store]]? | No such thing. Are you looking for the [[Lehmans|Amish hardware store]]? | ||
Actually, Lehman ''is'' a thing, and it drifts on like [[Nosferatu]], the un-dead, still spreading its influence over everything we do in a way that its bodily manifestation in life was plainly unable to. [[MF Global]] has a similar effect, though there, memories fade. We are but mortal. | Actually, [[Lehman]] ''is'' a thing, and it drifts on like [[Nosferatu]], the un-dead, still spreading its influence over everything we do in a way that its bodily manifestation in life was plainly unable to. [[MF Global]] has a similar effect, though there, memories fade. We are but mortal. | ||
For [[Lehman]] is a [[risk controller]]’s [[magic incantation]] — a [[hex]], a [[horcrux]], a way of killing lively debate stone dead in its tracks. For any new initiative, any pragmatic proposal to do things in a smarter way, can be derailed by oblique reference to the sad demise of Lehman | For [[Lehman]] is a [[risk controller]]’s [[magic incantation]] — a [[hex]], a [[horcrux]], a way of killing lively debate stone dead in its tracks. For any new initiative, any pragmatic proposal to do things in a smarter way, can be derailed by oblique reference to the sad demise of [[Lehman Brothers]], however irrelevant it may be. For, as we all know, [[Chicken-licken|the sky fell in]] on {{t|Lehman}}’s head because it tried to standardize its business and create robust operational flows that didn't involve [[credit]] sitting on [[cross default]] [[escalation]]s for three weeks. | ||
Similarly, | Similarly, [[Magic circle law firm|counsel]] will resist any stroke of your pen against their mangled syntax on the solemn, but unelucidated, pretext that they “lived through the [[Lehman]] administration” and are so scarred by the experience<ref>Look, let’s face facts, campers: the [[Lehman]] collapse was hardly some POW chain-gang on Burma Railway for our learned friends, so hold those crocodile tears.</ref> that that record must state, in [[legal triplicate]]s, obvious truisms (like [[Time is of the essence|time being of the essence]] [[shall]] not vitiate [[applicable]] contractual [[grace period]]s — real-life example) and under no circumstances can one be as foolhardy as to countenance an appeal to the common sense or formal symbolic logic to be applied by the [[Queen’s Bench Division]] of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales. | ||
Had only its [[credit]] team been allowed to vacillate nervously for weeks upon end about whether to waive {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} for [[Hedge fund]] clients, [[Lehman]] might still be with us today. | Had only its [[credit]] team been allowed to vacillate nervously for weeks upon end about whether to waive {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} for [[Hedge fund]] clients, [[Lehman]] might still be with us today. | ||
Revision as of 08:53, 2 July 2019
|
No such thing. Are you looking for the Amish hardware store?
Actually, Lehman is a thing, and it drifts on like Nosferatu, the un-dead, still spreading its influence over everything we do in a way that its bodily manifestation in life was plainly unable to. MF Global has a similar effect, though there, memories fade. We are but mortal.
For Lehman is a risk controller’s magic incantation — a hex, a horcrux, a way of killing lively debate stone dead in its tracks. For any new initiative, any pragmatic proposal to do things in a smarter way, can be derailed by oblique reference to the sad demise of Lehman Brothers, however irrelevant it may be. For, as we all know, the sky fell in on Lehman’s head because it tried to standardize its business and create robust operational flows that didn't involve credit sitting on cross default escalations for three weeks.
Similarly, counsel will resist any stroke of your pen against their mangled syntax on the solemn, but unelucidated, pretext that they “lived through the Lehman administration” and are so scarred by the experience[1] that that record must state, in legal triplicates, obvious truisms (like time being of the essence shall not vitiate applicable contractual grace periods — real-life example) and under no circumstances can one be as foolhardy as to countenance an appeal to the common sense or formal symbolic logic to be applied by the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales.
Had only its credit team been allowed to vacillate nervously for weeks upon end about whether to waive Credit Event Upon Merger for Hedge fund clients, Lehman might still be with us today.