IT department: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One of the great paradoxes of any large organisation, and a great example of an inverse correlation. For the larger the IT department is, the worse the firm’s information technology architecture is sure to be. There is, indeed, an upper bound on the potential size of any financial services firm: the point where it is ''too big to function''. | One of the great paradoxes of any large organisation, and a great example of an inverse correlation. For the larger the IT department is, the worse the firm’s information technology architecture is sure to be. There is, indeed, an [[Scale paradox - Risk Article|upper bound]] on the potential size of any financial services firm: the point where it is ''too big to function''. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Scale paradox - Risk Article]] | |||
*[[Intranet]] | *[[Intranet]] | ||
*[[Work-around]] | *[[Work-around]] | ||
Revision as of 13:31, 17 September 2019
One of the great paradoxes of any large organisation, and a great example of an inverse correlation. For the larger the IT department is, the worse the firm’s information technology architecture is sure to be. There is, indeed, an upper bound on the potential size of any financial services firm: the point where it is too big to function.