Exclusive licence: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}A licence granting possession over, and exclusive use of, a physical, corporeal thing, to the exclusion of anyone else. One can have possession over a [[chattel]]. One cannot (so easily) have ''exclusive'' possession over, for example, judgement day. Whether a [[licence]] for love is exclusive or not is a matter of some conjecture amongst legal scholars.<ref>Idol & Stevens, ''[[Rebel Yell]]'', 3rd. ed, Butterworths, 1983.
{{g}}A licence granting possession over, and exclusive use of, a physical, corporeal thing, to the exclusion of anyone else. One can have possession over a [[chattel]]. One cannot (so easily) have ''exclusive'' possession over, for example, judgement day. Whether a [[licence]] for love is exclusive or not is a matter of some conjecture amongst legal scholars<ref>Idol & Stevens, ''[[Rebel Yell]]'', 3rd. ed, Butterworths, 1983.</ref>.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Latest revision as of 20:03, 26 September 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A licence granting possession over, and exclusive use of, a physical, corporeal thing, to the exclusion of anyone else. One can have possession over a chattel. One cannot (so easily) have exclusive possession over, for example, judgement day. Whether a licence for love is exclusive or not is a matter of some conjecture amongst legal scholars[1].

See also

References

  1. Idol & Stevens, Rebel Yell, 3rd. ed, Butterworths, 1983.