Perfection: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Sadly, the [[financial Collateral Directive]] has taken much of the fun out of this, by rendering it basically unnecessary: if i charge counts as a “[[financial collateral arrangement]]”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the [[security interest]] with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the [[Slavenberg]] filing) do not apply. | Sadly, the [[financial Collateral Directive]] has taken much of the fun out of this, by rendering it basically unnecessary: if i charge counts as a “[[financial collateral arrangement]]”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the [[security interest]] with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the [[Slavenberg]] filing) do not apply. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Security]] | *[[Security]] | ||
*[[Fixed charge]] | *[[Fixed charge]] | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 4 November 2019
|
|
A word about credit risk mitigation
|
The art of making something - in legal circles, often a security interest like a fixed charge, perfect: tickety-boo, compliant with all formalities and enforceable in a court of your choosing.
Sadly, the financial Collateral Directive has taken much of the fun out of this, by rendering it basically unnecessary: if i charge counts as a “financial collateral arrangement”, the formal registration and perfection requirements which would otherwise apply (eg notification; registering the security interest with the registrar of companies, the hilarious pantomime of the Slavenberg filing) do not apply.