Template:Misrepresentation by agent: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Representations by [[agent]]s and [[investment manager]]s=== | ===[[Representations]] by [[agent]]s and [[investment manager]]s=== | ||
Where your client’s obligations under the {{isdama}} are stewarded by an agent — quite common for investment | Where your client’s obligations under the {{isdama}} are stewarded by an [[agent]] — quite common for an [[investment manager]] trading on behalf of a [[fund]] [[principal]] — you might think about asking the [[agent]] to represent on its own behalf about its role as [[agent]], in the ISDA. You may like to hear it confirm its ongoing authority to bind the [[principal]] and place orders on its behalf. You may wish it would confirm its regulatory authorisation and and vouch for its own [[good standing]], and to the continued involvement of its [[key person]]s in making investment decisions. [[Mediocre lawyer|Imaginative counsel]] can no doubt dream up others. | ||
But tarry a while. Firstly, your [[investment manager]] will sign as [[agent]], for the [[client]], not on its own behalf. For many this will be an article of profound faith: those will be at some pains, which they will willingly inflict on you, to avoid the barest hint they are speaking for themselves on a trading contract. When an [[agent]], ''as'' [[agent]], opens its mouth, it becomes its [[principal]] for all purposes that interest the law. As far as the [[Courts of Chancery|courts of chancery]] are concerned, it has wholly transubstantiated ''into its client''. Transmogrified. For all forensic intents an agent is no longer itself; it is just the earthly representation of its principal. | |||
Revision as of 17:44, 21 November 2019
Representations by agents and investment managers
Where your client’s obligations under the ISDA Master Agreement are stewarded by an agent — quite common for an investment manager trading on behalf of a fund principal — you might think about asking the agent to represent on its own behalf about its role as agent, in the ISDA. You may like to hear it confirm its ongoing authority to bind the principal and place orders on its behalf. You may wish it would confirm its regulatory authorisation and and vouch for its own good standing, and to the continued involvement of its key persons in making investment decisions. Imaginative counsel can no doubt dream up others.
But tarry a while. Firstly, your investment manager will sign as agent, for the client, not on its own behalf. For many this will be an article of profound faith: those will be at some pains, which they will willingly inflict on you, to avoid the barest hint they are speaking for themselves on a trading contract. When an agent, as agent, opens its mouth, it becomes its principal for all purposes that interest the law. As far as the courts of chancery are concerned, it has wholly transubstantiated into its client. Transmogrified. For all forensic intents an agent is no longer itself; it is just the earthly representation of its principal.