2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
the {{PAGENAME}} are intended to be used with the {{isdama}}. To create a hyperlink to an article on any aspect of the Equity Derivatives Definitions, use the tag:
The {{PAGENAME}} are intended to be used with the {{isdama}}. This is dreadful, leaden literature — but everyone has sort of put up with it, and got used to it. They were meant to be superseded, in 2011, by the [[2011 Equity Derivatives Definitions]], thrillingly written by a squadron of [[chatbot]]s from [[Linklaters]] in bang-up-to-date, state-of-the-art, super duper hi-tech [[Financial products Markup Language]], but — well, every one still uses the stupid old 2002 versions. The [[JC]] being in the first rank a pragmatist, you will find little information here about the newer booklet — other than the odd wry remark about the [[Hindenburg]], and the mortal scarring to those poor folk at [[Linklaters]] who wrote the damn things, but plenty about the ghastly old {{2002equitydefs}} — a whole [[Equity Derivatives Anatomy|anatomy]] dedicated to that — seeing as that is what everyone still uses.


<nowiki>{{eqderivprov|ARTICLE TITLE}}</nowiki>
{{sa}}
 
Alternatively, use the [[image:Eq.png]] button in the toolbar above.
 
 
===References===
See:
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[Equity Derivatives Anatomy]]
*[[ISDA Anatomy]]
*[[ISDA Anatomy]]
*[[Flight 19]]


{{eqderivanatomy}}
{{eqderivanatomy}}

Revision as of 17:08, 3 December 2019

The 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions are intended to be used with the ISDA Master Agreement. This is dreadful, leaden literature — but everyone has sort of put up with it, and got used to it. They were meant to be superseded, in 2011, by the 2011 Equity Derivatives Definitions, thrillingly written by a squadron of chatbots from Linklaters in bang-up-to-date, state-of-the-art, super duper hi-tech Financial products Markup Language, but — well, every one still uses the stupid old 2002 versions. The JC being in the first rank a pragmatist, you will find little information here about the newer booklet — other than the odd wry remark about the Hindenburg, and the mortal scarring to those poor folk at Linklaters who wrote the damn things, but plenty about the ghastly old 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions — a whole anatomy dedicated to that — seeing as that is what everyone still uses.

See also

Template:Eqderivanatomy