Fox pass: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


The {{gmsla}} is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. [[jimzler]], [[gummizler]], [[gee-em-ess-el-aye]]: all are fine, but may peg you as a regional specialist (or quaintly old-fashioned) at worst.
The {{gmsla}} is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. [[jimzler]], [[gummizler]], [[gee-em-ess-el-aye]]: all are fine, but may peg you as a regional specialist (or quaintly old-fashioned) at worst.
{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[ISDA Anatomy]]
*[[ISDA Anatomy]]
*[[GMSLA Anatomy]]
*[[GMSLA Anatomy]]
{{draft}}{{egg}}
{{draft}}{{egg}}

Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020

Negotiation Anatomy™

A passing fox, yesterday
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

As with any arcane and specialist subject, the ISDA documentation of derivatives is strewn with buried roots and faux pas for the unwary to trip over. Beware those who refer to their agreement as an eye-ess-dee-aye (it's izder), or a transaction under it as a Sw-æp (it's Sw-ŏp).

The 2010 GMSLA is more benign for ingénues, on the other hand. jimzler, gummizler, gee-em-ess-el-aye: all are fine, but may peg you as a regional specialist (or quaintly old-fashioned) at worst.

See also