Non-Hedging Party - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivsnap|12.9(xii)}} | {{eqderivsnap|12.9(xii)}} | ||
====Commentary==== | ====Commentary==== | ||
Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise both parties are Non-Hedging Parties. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition at all ... | Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise ''both'' parties are {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Parties}}. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition of {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} at all ... | ||
====Related Provisions==== | ====Related Provisions==== | ||
Revision as of 09:33, 31 October 2012
Commentary
Note hugely controversial, you wuold think, but it does sort of imply that the Hedging Party is itself a party to the transaction - otherwise both parties are Non-Hedging Parties. But if so, then there's not really any need for the definition of Hedging Party at all ...