Hedging Party - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(ix)}} | {{eqderivsnap|12.9(a)(ix)}} | ||
====Commentary==== | ====Commentary==== | ||
Relevant in the context of hedging disruption as the entity which is actually carrying out the hedging activity, if it isn't the party itself. | Relevant in the context of {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Events}} and hedging disruption as the entity which is actually carrying out the hedging activity, if it isn't the party itself (where not specified, it defaults to the parties themselves. | ||
Now, even if hedging against the street is carried out out of another group entity, there would be an inter-company risk transfer so arguable a bit otiose). Note also that "{{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}}" definition somewhat assumes that the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} will indeed be the actual counterparty to the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}. | |||
====See also==== | ====See also==== |
Revision as of 09:35, 31 October 2012
Commentary
Relevant in the context of Additional Disruption Events and hedging disruption as the entity which is actually carrying out the hedging activity, if it isn't the party itself (where not specified, it defaults to the parties themselves.
Now, even if hedging against the street is carried out out of another group entity, there would be an inter-company risk transfer so arguable a bit otiose). Note also that "Non-Hedging Party" definition somewhat assumes that the Hedging Party will indeed be the actual counterparty to the Transaction.
See also
See, for example, definitions: