Why your job is safe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|technology}}An occasional running series. Your job is safe as long as: *Google thinks this is a sensible probability for a cricket match: *Microsoft’s auto-correct for..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|technology}}An occasional running series. | {{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]]}}An occasional running series. | ||
Your job is safe as long as: | Your job is safe as long as: | ||
*Google thinks | |||
*Google thinks that ==> is a sensible win prediction for a cricket match: | |||
*Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business” | *Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business” | ||
*Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser” | *Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser” | ||
Revision as of 18:36, 13 February 2020
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series. 
|
An occasional running series.
Your job is safe as long as:
- Google thinks that ==> is a sensible win prediction for a cricket match:
- Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”
- Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”