Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 5(a)(iii): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A bit of pedantic [[flannel]] found its way in to the {{2002ma}} — it captures not just the failure of the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} itself, but any security interest granted under it, catering to the [[legal eagle]]’s paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct [[Ontology|ontological]] existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same. | A bit of pedantic [[flannel]] found its way in to the {{2002ma}} — it captures not just the failure of the {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}} itself, but any [[security interest]] granted under it, catering to the [[legal eagle]]’s most paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct [[Ontology|ontological]] existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same. | ||
Revision as of 10:56, 25 February 2020
A bit of pedantic flannel found its way in to the 2002 ISDA — it captures not just the failure of the Credit Support Document itself, but any security interest granted under it, catering to the legal eagle’s most paranoid fears that a contractual right can have some sort of distinct ontological existence from the agreement which gives it breath and enforceable currency in the first place. But otherwise the same.