Fifth law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}The Jolly Contrarian’s [[fifth law of worker entropy]] states that there is an inverse relationship between the amount of time, ''t'', a worker spends on a task and its overall importance, ''i'', to the organisation. | {{g}}The Jolly Contrarian’s [[fifth law of worker entropy]] states that there is an inverse relationship between the amount of time, ''t'', a worker spends on a task and its overall importance, ''i'', to the organisation. | ||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
*'''[[Human resources]]''': The organisation will wrack itself for four months of the year crashing mainframe computer systems trying to get a performance appraisal system to work; enforcing its [[clear desk policy]], formulating and updating its [[risk taxonomy]] and promoting an internal [[career fair]], but expend no energy promoting actual risk | *'''[[Human resources]]''': The organisation will wrack itself for four months of the year crashing mainframe computer systems trying to get a performance appraisal system to work; enforcing its [[clear desk policy]], by way of putative apology celebrating the existence of one half (only) of the population, formulating and updating its [[risk taxonomy]] and promoting an internal [[career fair]], but expend exactly ''no'' energy promoting actual risk management or risk reduction. | ||
*'''[[Negotiation]]''': A [[negotiator]] will spend literally days battling away on the precise waterfall of dispute fallbacks for a [[NAV trigger]] — never to be used once the agreement is signed, except to periodically waive triggers that will have inevitably been set too sensitively — but will agree a [[failure to pay]] [[event of default]] — the one realistic event ever needed — without her counterparty so much as pausing to for breath before moving onto the next item. | *'''[[Negotiation]]''': A [[negotiator]] will spend literally days battling away on the precise waterfall of dispute fallbacks for a [[NAV trigger]] — never to be used once the agreement is signed, except to periodically waive triggers that will have inevitably been set too sensitively — but will agree a [[failure to pay]] [[event of default]] — the one realistic event ever needed — without her counterparty so much as pausing to for breath before moving onto the next item. | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 12 March 2020
|
The Jolly Contrarian’s fifth law of worker entropy states that there is an inverse relationship between the amount of time, t, a worker spends on a task and its overall importance, i, to the organisation.
Examples
- Human resources: The organisation will wrack itself for four months of the year crashing mainframe computer systems trying to get a performance appraisal system to work; enforcing its clear desk policy, by way of putative apology celebrating the existence of one half (only) of the population, formulating and updating its risk taxonomy and promoting an internal career fair, but expend exactly no energy promoting actual risk management or risk reduction.
- Negotiation: A negotiator will spend literally days battling away on the precise waterfall of dispute fallbacks for a NAV trigger — never to be used once the agreement is signed, except to periodically waive triggers that will have inevitably been set too sensitively — but will agree a failure to pay event of default — the one realistic event ever needed — without her counterparty so much as pausing to for breath before moving onto the next item.