Template:Isda Affected Party comp: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Not even {{icds}} could confect something worthwhile to say which might improve this Spartan piece of text. Elsewhere there is much monkeying around as regards the concept of...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Not even {{icds}} could confect something worthwhile to say which might improve this Spartan piece of text. Elsewhere there is much monkeying around as regards the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Illegality}}, particularly insofar as it relates to {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}s, and the newly introduced {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}}.
Not even {{icds}} could confect something worthwhile to say which might improve this Spartan piece of text. But note the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Affected Party}} is sprayed [[libtard|liberally]] throughout Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}}, and it means something different in almost every context so you’re guaranteed to have fun there.
 
Elsewhere there is much monkeying around as regards the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Illegality}}, particularly insofar as it relates to {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}s, and the newly introduced {{isdaprov|Force Majeure}}.

Latest revision as of 18:22, 12 April 2020

Not even ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ could confect something worthwhile to say which might improve this Spartan piece of text. But note the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Affected Party}} is sprayed liberally throughout Section {{{{{1}}}|5(b)}}, and it means something different in almost every context so you’re guaranteed to have fun there.

Elsewhere there is much monkeying around as regards the concept of {{{{{1}}}|Illegality}}, particularly insofar as it relates to {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}}s, and the newly introduced Force Majeure.