Template:Time is of the essence capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Time is of the essence]]<ref>Or “time shall be of the essence”, or “time shall be deemed to be on or about the essence” — let your imaginations run wild.</ref> is a [[magic incantation]] that one puts into a [[contract]] to designate that, whatever else might go down, a party’s failure to comply with obligations within the stated time-frame is a [[fundamental breach]] justifying termination of {{tag|contract}}, a plague upon your houses, apocalyptic horsemen on the ridge and so on.
[[Time is of the essence]]<ref>Or “time shall be of the essence”, or “time shall be deemed to be on or about the essence” — let your imaginations run wild.</ref> is a [[magic incantation]] that one puts into a [[contract]] to designate that, whatever else might go down, a party’s failure to comply with obligations within the stated time-frame is a [[fundamental breach]] justifying termination of {{tag|contract}}, a plague upon your houses, apocalyptic horsemen on the ridge and so on.


Now at [[common law]], time is — ''was'' — ''always'' of the essence. When any time is specified for the completion of an action, one party has an action if the other doesn’t performed by that time<ref>{{citer|Parkin|Thorold|1852|16Beav.|59}}.</ref>.
Now at [[common law]], time is — ''was'' — ''always'' of the essence. When any time is specified for the completion of an action, one party has an action if the other doesn’t performed by that time.<ref>{{citer|Parkin|Thorold|1852|16Beav.|59}}.</ref>


But as always, the dear old [[courts of chancery]] have to have their say. In equity, time is only fundamental to a contract if:
But as always, the dear old [[courts of chancery]] have to have their say. In equity, time is only fundamental to a contract if:

Latest revision as of 16:00, 30 June 2020

Time is of the essence[1] is a magic incantation that one puts into a contract to designate that, whatever else might go down, a party’s failure to comply with obligations within the stated time-frame is a fundamental breach justifying termination of contract, a plague upon your houses, apocalyptic horsemen on the ridge and so on.

Now at common law, time is — wasalways of the essence. When any time is specified for the completion of an action, one party has an action if the other doesn’t performed by that time.[2]

But as always, the dear old courts of chancery have to have their say. In equity, time is only fundamental to a contract if:

  • it is expressed to be “of the essence”; or
  • Otherwise, the circumstances indicate the time limit must be complied with exactly;
  • Where neither of the above applies, but one party has been unduly delaysome, the other can give notice requiring performance within a reasonable time, therefore making time of the essence.
  1. Or “time shall be of the essence”, or “time shall be deemed to be on or about the essence” — let your imaginations run wild.
  2. Parkin v Thorold (1852) 16Beav. 59.