Don’t tick boxes: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|devil|}}Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist Otto Büchstein, the victory of form over substance. This disp..."
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]], [[the victory of form over substance]]. This disposition that one should ticking a box should generate any comfort other than a false one, feeds on, just as it nourishes, associated dogmas: of ''cost'' reduction at all cost, that all unknowns can be known, that all vestiges of risk can neutralised, bifurcated, cauterised and ''eliminated'' to leave a pure, crystalline residue of concentrated reward.  That [[The End of History and the First Man - book review|history is at an end]], that the universe can be brute-force computed, and the fact that it hasn’t yet is a minor inconvenience that we can tide over just as long as we check of few boxes and keep a clear audit trail.
{{a|devil|}}Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist [[Otto Büchstein]], ''[[La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza]]''.<ref>Literally, “The Victory of Form over Substance”. Never popular.</ref>
 
This disposition that ticking a box - fulfilling a formal requirement to have taken a step, followed a process, or sublimated an original thought should generate any comfort other than a false one, feeds on, just as it nourishes, related dogmas: of ''cost'' reduction, at all cost, that all unknowns can be known, that all vestiges of risk can neutralised, bifurcated, cauterised and ''eliminated'' to leave a pure, crystalline residue of concentrated ''reward''.  That [[The End of History and the First Man - book review|history is at an end]], that the universe can be brute-force computed, and the fact that it hasn’t yet is a minor inconvenience that we can tide over just as long as we check of few boxes and keep a clear audit trail.
 
[[Box ticking]] is [[tedious]], in the technical sense of being intrinsically wasteful.

Revision as of 14:53, 8 August 2020

In which the curmudgeonly old sod puts the world to rights.
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Modern dogma writ large. In the mortal, unlistened-to words of tiresome Victorian librettist Otto Büchstein, La Vittoria della Forma sulla Sostanza.[1]

This disposition that ticking a box - fulfilling a formal requirement to have taken a step, followed a process, or sublimated an original thought should generate any comfort other than a false one, feeds on, just as it nourishes, related dogmas: of cost reduction, at all cost, that all unknowns can be known, that all vestiges of risk can neutralised, bifurcated, cauterised and eliminated to leave a pure, crystalline residue of concentrated reward. That history is at an end, that the universe can be brute-force computed, and the fact that it hasn’t yet is a minor inconvenience that we can tide over just as long as we check of few boxes and keep a clear audit trail.

Box ticking is tedious, in the technical sense of being intrinsically wasteful.

  1. Literally, “The Victory of Form over Substance”. Never popular.